Stable highway cruiser

Engine & Performance

Comfort

Safety

Features

Design

Value for Money

Vehicle stays firmly planted at triple digit speeds with zero vibration. Safety pack is fantastic. But rear camera layout has no dynamic guidelines in lower trims, and camera clarity gets grainy in dark conditions. Front armrest storage space is limited.

By: Sachin Khedekar (3 Jul 2026)

Share via:

Skoda Kylaq User Reviews & Ratings

4.6

123 Ratings & Reviews

1 & above	0
2 & above	0
3 & above	10
4 & above	37
5 rating	76

Write a Review

Average space low mileage

Performance is okay but city mileage is bad around 10kmpl. Rear seat width is narrow for three adults, fine for kids only. Stiff suspension setup means rough ride inside city limits.

By: Ankit Tyagi (Jul 3, 2026)

Read full Review

High maintenance costs

Spare parts are costly and service centers take time. Turbo lag is annoying below 2000 RPM in traffic. AC touch panel controls are difficult to use while driving safely.

By: Mohit Rana (Jul 3, 2026)

Read full Review

Thirsty turbo petrol motor

Real world fuel economy drops to 9 kmpl in heavy traffic jams. Infotainment screen freezes occasionally during wireless phone connection. Rear seat legroom is quite limited.

By: Rohit Bisht (Jul 3, 2026)

Read full Review

Stiff ride quality inside

Car looks nice but suspension is too hard for daily city roads. Every small pothole is felt directly inside cabin. Missing features like ADAS or a premium sound system.

By: Deepanshu Rawat (Jul 3, 2026)

Read full Review

Stiff suspension loud cabin

Road noise enters cabin easily at highway speeds. Suspension tuning is too firm for passenger comfort over expansion joints. Clutch has long play for city use.

By: Ajay Panwar (Jul 3, 2026)

Read full Review

Average city commuter car

Performance comes only after turbo kicks in. Below that it feels dead. Rear headroom is tight for people above 5.10 feet. AC takes time to cool whole cabin space.

By: Dinesh Kandpal (Jul 3, 2026)

Read full Review

Ordinary interior look feel

Dashboard looks boring with too much dark plastics. No option for CNG or diesel variant makes running cost high for daily long distance drivers. Average product.

By: Harish Dhoundiyal (Jul 3, 2026)

Read full Review

Missing premium features

No 360 degree camera or heads up display at this price tag. Engine makes loud humming noise when revved hard above 4000 RPM. Interior plastic feels hard on lower half.

By: Vikas Nautiyal (Jul 3, 2026)

Read full Review

Tight rear seating space

Safe build but space management is poor inside. Three adults cannot sit comfortably on long journeys at back row. Reverse camera video quality is laggy and blurry at night.

By: Manoj Negi (Jul 3, 2026)

Read full Review

High price low efficiency

Feels solid but engine demands constant gear changes in city. Highway mileage is okay but city efficiency is pathetic. Not value for money option for daily commute.

By: Sandeep Pundir (Jul 3, 2026)

Read full Review