Mahindra faces legal trouble as Fiat aims to block Roxor in Jeep trademark case

Fiat Chrysler sued Mahindra in Michigan court and at the U.S. International Trade Commission in 2018 over its Roxor design, arguing it copied trademar
Mahindra Automotive North America's US plant in Michigan manufactures off-road vehicle Roxor. (Photo courtesy:
Mahindra Automotive North America's US plant in Michigan manufactures off-road vehicle Roxor. (Photo courtesy:

Fiat Chrysler on Monday received a second chance to permanently block US sales of redesigned Roxor off-road vehicles made by Indian carmaker Mahindra and Mahindra Limited, which is fighting claims that it copied Fiat Chrysler's Jeep design.

The 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals said that a Detroit federal court applied the wrong standard when it found that Mahindra's post-2020 Roxors were unlikely to cause consumer confusion.

Also check these Cars

Find more Cars
Jeep Wrangler (HT Auto photo)
Engine Icon1995 cc FuelType IconPetrol
₹ 67.65 - 71.65 Lakhs
View Offers
Jeep Compass (HT Auto photo)
Engine Icon1956 cc FuelType IconDiesel
₹ 20.69 - 32.27 Lakhs
View Offers
Jeep Avenger (HT Auto photo)
BatteryCapacity Icon50.8 kWh Range Icon400 km
₹ 20 - 50 Lakhs
Alert Me When Launched
Jeep Meridian (HT Auto photo)
Engine Icon1956.0 cc FuelType IconDiesel
₹ 29.90 - 36.95 Lakhs
View Offers
Jeep Grand Cherokee (HT Auto photo)
Engine Icon1995.0 cc FuelType IconPetrol
₹ 77.50 Lakhs
Jeep Sub-4m Suv (HT Auto photo)
Engine Icon1998 cc FuelType IconPetrol
₹ 10 Lakhs
Alert Me When Launched

A spokesperson for Mahindra said it was confident that the outcome of the case will be "consistent with the previous rulings" in its favor. Fiat Chrysler's parent company Stellantis NV declined to comment on the decision.

A Detroit federal court blocked Mahindra from selling pre-2020 Roxors, but rejected its bid to block sales of its redesigned version of the off-road-only vehicle. US District Judge Gershwin Drain's decision was based on an ITC ruling that the Roxor did not infringe Fiat Chrysler's trademark rights because the average person would "know immediately" from looking at it that it is not a Jeep.

But the 6th Circuit said Monday that the court should have held Mahindra to a higher standard because it was already a known infringer. Mahindra's new design was required to keep a "safe distance" from Jeep designs, US Circuit Judge Helene White wrote for a three-judge panel.

"Because a court can enjoin even a non-infringing product under the safe-distance rule, the simple fact that a known infringer's redesigned product is non-infringing does not support the conclusion that the safe-distance rule should not apply," White said.

The appeals court sent the case back for the Detroit court to consider whether the new Roxors kept a "safe distance" from the Jeep design.

The case is Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd vs FCA US LLC, 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 21-2605.

First Published Date: 20 Sep 2022, 11:27 AM IST

Check Latest Offers

Please provide your details to get Personalized Offers

Choose city
+91 | Choose city
Choose city

Want to get the best price for your existing car?

Powered by: Spinny Logo
By clicking "View Offers" you Agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy
Dear Name

Please verify your mobile number.

+91 | Choose city
Couldn't verify the OTP.
It's either expired or it's incorrect.