Mahindra faces legal trouble as Fiat aims to block Roxor in Jeep trademark case

Fiat Chrysler sued Mahindra in Michigan court and at the U.S. International Trade Commission in 2018 over its Roxor design, arguing it copied trademark-protected elements of its Jeeps.
By : Reuters
| Updated on: 20 Sep 2022, 11:27 AM
Mahindra Automotive North America's US plant in Michigan manufactures off-road vehicle Roxor. (Photo courtesy: mahindraautomotivena.com)
Mahindra Automotive North America's US plant in Michigan manufactures off-road vehicle Roxor. (Photo courtesy: mahindraautomotivena.com)
Mahindra Automotive North America's US plant in Michigan manufactures off-road vehicle Roxor. (Photo courtesy: mahindraautomotivena.com)
Mahindra Automotive North America's US plant in Michigan manufactures off-road vehicle Roxor. (Photo courtesy: mahindraautomotivena.com)

Fiat Chrysler on Monday received a second chance to permanently block US sales of redesigned Roxor off-road vehicles made by Indian carmaker Mahindra and Mahindra Limited, which is fighting claims that it copied Fiat Chrysler's Jeep design.

The 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals said that a Detroit federal court applied the wrong standard when it found that Mahindra's post-2020 Roxors were unlikely to cause consumer confusion.

Trending Cars

Find More Cars

A spokesperson for Mahindra said it was confident that the outcome of the case will be "consistent with the previous rulings" in its favor. Fiat Chrysler's parent company Stellantis NV declined to comment on the decision.

FOLLOW US:Stay Updated with latest content - Subscribe us on
FOLLOW US:Stay Updated with latest content - Subscribe us on

A Detroit federal court blocked Mahindra from selling pre-2020 Roxors, but rejected its bid to block sales of its redesigned version of the off-road-only vehicle. US District Judge Gershwin Drain's decision was based on an ITC ruling that the Roxor did not infringe Fiat Chrysler's trademark rights because the average person would "know immediately" from looking at it that it is not a Jeep.

But the 6th Circuit said Monday that the court should have held Mahindra to a higher standard because it was already a known infringer. Mahindra's new design was required to keep a "safe distance" from Jeep designs, US Circuit Judge Helene White wrote for a three-judge panel.

"Because a court can enjoin even a non-infringing product under the safe-distance rule, the simple fact that a known infringer's redesigned product is non-infringing does not support the conclusion that the safe-distance rule should not apply," White said.

The appeals court sent the case back for the Detroit court to consider whether the new Roxors kept a "safe distance" from the Jeep design.

The case is Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd vs FCA US LLC, 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 21-2605.

First Published Date: 20 Sep 2022, 11:27 AM IST
Recommended For You
View All
NEXT ARTICLE BEGINS

Please provide your details to get Personalized Offers on

Choose city
+91 | Choose city
Choose city
Choose city
By clicking VIEW OFFERS you Agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy

Dear Name

Please verify your mobile number.

+91 | Choose city