Uber customer claims company won price-fixing suit because arbitrator was scared

An Uber customer initiated the high-profile 2015 antitrust lawsuit alleging that the company engaged in an illegal conspiracy with its drivers to coor
...
FILE PHOTO: Uber argued that its drivers are independent contractors and that its app is merely a technology platform connecting drivers with riders. (REUTERS)
FILE PHOTO: Uber argued that its drivers are independent contractors and that its app is merely a technology platform connecting drivers with riders.

An Uber customer on Friday asked a Manhattan federal judge to overturn an arbitration win for the company in a price-fixing case, arguing that the arbitrator only ruled in Uber's favor because he was scared.

Spencer Meyer initiated the high-profile 2015 antitrust lawsuit alleging that Uber Technologies Inc engaged in an illegal conspiracy with its drivers to coordinate high "surge pricing" fares during periods of heavy demand by agreeing to charge prices set by an algorithm in the Uber ride-hailing app.

Also check these Vehicles

Find more Cars
Emote Electric Surge (HT Auto photo)
UPCOMING
40 Ah 120 Kmph 100.0
₹ 1 Lakhs
View Details
Kinetic Green Flex (HT Auto photo)
3 kWh 72 kmph 120 km
₹ 1.10 Lakhs
Compare
Tvs Iqube Electric (HT Auto photo)
4.56 kWh 78 kmph 100 km
₹ 1.17 - 1.23 Lakhs
Compare
View Offers
Hero Electric Ae-47 E-bike (HT Auto photo)
UPCOMING
3.5 kWh 85 Kmph 160 Km
₹ 1 Lakhs
View Details
Bajaj Chetak (HT Auto photo)
3.2 kWh 73 kmph 126 km
₹ 1.15 - 1.35 Lakhs
Compare
View Offers
Pure Ev Epluto 7g Pro (HT Auto photo)
3 kWh 60 Kmph 150 Km
₹99,999
Compare

Uber takes a cut from drivers' earnings, and ride-hailing trips in North America make up the bulk of the company's revenue. The lawsuit sought a nationwide ban against surge pricing.

Also Read : Uber has spent $19 million on coronavirus financial assistance for drivers

Uber argues its drivers are independent contractors and that its app is merely a technology platform connecting drivers with riders. Uber on Friday declined to comment on the court filing.

The company has previously said it believed the law was on its side, pointing to the fact that no antitrust agency has raised issues.

The lawsuit went through several courts before it was sent into arbitration in 2019 in accordance with Uber's terms of service that mandate arbitration behind closed doors for most lawsuits.

The appointed arbitrator, attorney Les Weinstein, on Feb. 22 ruled in Uber's favor and dismissed the lawsuit, but according to Friday's filings he did so out of "evident partiality."

Also Read : Uber cuts 3,000 more jobs, closes offices in pandemic revamp

A transcript excerpt of the arbitration, attached to the filing, cited him saying: "I must say I act out of fear. My fear is if I ruled Uber illegal, I would need security. I wouldn't be able to walk the streets at night. People would be after me."

Weinstein also questioned whether he had the legal power to ban surge pricing nationwide. He did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Uber has a week to respond to the filing in court.

First Published Date: 23 May 2020, 10:36 AM IST
NEXT ARTICLE BEGINS

Please provide your details to get Personalized Offers on

Choose city
+91 | Choose city
Choose city
Choose city

Want to get the best price for your existing car?

Powered by: Spinny Logo
By clicking "View Offers" you Agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy

Dear Name

Please verify your mobile number.

+91 | Choose city
Couldn't verify the OTP.
It's either expired or it's incorrect.