Man sues Ford India dealer over ‘31 kmpl’ ad, top court slams brake

A complaint had been filed with the District Forum in which it was stated that Ford India had put up advertisements in national newspapers claiming a
...
File photo used for representational purpose only.
File photo used for representational purpose only.

A Ford dealer had recently been directed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) to pay a complainant 7.43 after he had pointed to deficiency in service over a ‘misleading’ advertisement which claimed the car returns an average of 31 kilometres to a lire of fuel. The Supreme Court, however, set aside the order of NCDRC.

A complaint had been filed with the District Forum in which it was stated that Ford India had put up advertisements in national newspapers claiming a mileage of 31.4 kmpl. The complainant, however, said that the Ford Fiesta he purchased from AB Motors Pvt Limited in Dehradun had a mileage of around 15 to 16 kmpl. As such, the OEM and the dealer had been directed to pay the complainant 7.43 lakh once the said vehicle was returned.

Also check these Vehicles

Find more Cars
Ford Mustang Mach E (HT Auto photo)
UPCOMING
₹ 70 Lakhs
View Details
Benling India Believe (HT Auto photo)
BatteryCapacity Icon3.2 kWh Range Icon120 km
₹ 1.26 Lakhs
Compare
Benling India Benling Kriti (HT Auto photo)
Range Icon60 km/charge
₹ 56,940 - 66,121
Compare
View Offers
Benling India Benling Aura (HT Auto photo)
Range Icon120 Km/charge
₹73,000
Compare
Benling India Benling Falcon (HT Auto photo)
Range Icon75 km/charge
₹ 62,200 - 71,248
Compare
View Offers
Hcd India Nps Cargo (HT Auto photo)
Range Icon70 km/charge
₹ 54,500 - 58,500
Compare
View Offers

This had led to Ford India filing an appeal before the State Commission but this had been dismissed while NCDRC allowed the revision petition. This even as the onus on paying the compensation amount fell on the dealer.

The matter eventually reached the country's apex court and a two-judge bench stated that the NCDRC has recorded a finding that the alleged misleading advertisement was issued on June 20, 2007. It was also noted that the complainant, however, had purchased his car around three months prior to this, that is on March 9 of 2007.

The Supreme Court also stated that the interest of the dealers cannot be independent of the vehicle manufacturer.

It is important to note here that the mileage figures often claimed by almost every manufacturer in the passenger vehicle and two-wheeler space is the absolute highest that the said vehicle is capable of. The real world figures are almost always less than these claims because of a range of factors that affect mileage in the real world. Even ARAI-certified mileage figures may best be used as a reference point as tests are conducted in controlled scenarios.

(With inputs from PTI)

First Published Date: 15 Oct 2021, 09:03 AM IST
NEXT ARTICLE BEGINS

Please provide your details to get Personalized Offers on

Choose city
+91 | Choose city
Choose city
Choose city

Want to get the best price for your existing car?

Powered by: Spinny Logo
By clicking "View Offers" you Agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy

Dear Name

Please verify your mobile number.

+91 | Choose city
Couldn't verify the OTP.
It's either expired or it's incorrect.