No insurance claim if vehicle driven without valid registration: Supreme Court

Supreme Court's observation came during the hearing of a case where a vehicle, whose insured sum was 6.17 lakh, had a temporary registration and had expired 10 years ago.
By : HT Auto Desk
| Updated on: 09 Jan 2022, 15:22 PM
No insurance claim if vehicle driven without valid registration, said Supreme Court. (File photo) (PTI)
No insurance claim if vehicle driven without valid registration, said Supreme Court. (File photo) (PTI)
No insurance claim if vehicle driven without valid registration, said Supreme Court. (File photo) (PTI)
No insurance claim if vehicle driven without valid registration, said Supreme Court. (File photo)

Supreme Court has came out with the observation that car insurance claim for vehicles without valid registration can be denied. The observation was made on Saturday when Supreme Court rejected an insurance claim of a car with temporary registration which was reportedly stolen.

United India Insurance Company Limited, one of the more popular vehicle insurance companies in India, had filed an appeal against the claim. United India Insurance had challenged an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission which dismissed the company's petition challenging an earlier redressal in Rajasthan. The vehicle, a Mahindra Bolero with an insured sum of 6.17 lakh, had expired 10 years ago.

Similar Cars

Find More Cars
Mahindra Bolero Neo (HT Auto photo)
Mahindra Bolero Neo
1493 cc | Diesel | Manual | 17.29 kmpl
₹8.48 - 10.99 Lakhs**Ex-showroom price
Mahindra Bolero (HT Auto photo)
Mahindra Bolero
1493 cc | Diesel | Manual | 16.7 kmpl
₹8.53 - 10.81 Lakhs**Ex-showroom price
Toyota Urban Cruiser (HT Auto photo)
Toyota Urban Cruiser
1462 cc | Petrol | Manual | 17.03 kmpl
₹8.5 - 11.4 Lakhs**Ex-showroom price
Honda Wr-v (HT Auto photo)
Honda Wr-v
1199 cc | Petrol | Manual | 16.5 kmpl
₹8.66 - 12.21 Lakhs**Ex-showroom price
Kia Carens (HT Auto photo)
Kia Carens
1497 cc | Petrol | Manual | 16.5 kmpl
₹8.99 - 16.99 Lakhs**Ex-showroom price

The top court dismissed the insurance claim saying there is a fundamental breach of the terms and conditions of the policy. “What is important is this Court's opinion of the law, that when an insurable incident that potentially results in liability occurs, there should be no fundamental breach of the conditions contained in the contract of insurance," said the bench, headed by Justice U U Lalit and Justices S Ravindra Bhat and Bela M Trivedi.

FOLLOW US:Stay Updated with latest content - Subscribe us on
FOLLOW US:Stay Updated with latest content - Subscribe us on

The Supreme Court made the observation, noting that the Bolero SUV had been driven without a valid registration on the date of theft. The offence is a violation of Sections 39 and 192 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

“This results in a fundamental breach of the terms and conditions of the policy, as held by this Court in Narinder Singh (supra), entitling the insurer to repudiate the policy. This court is of the opinion that the NCDRC's order cannot be sustained," the bench said.

The owner of the vehicle had bought the insurance policy in Punjab, despite being a resident of Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 10 years ago, his vehicle was stolen from a parking lot in Jodhpur. He lodged an FIR at Jodhpur alleging commission of offences under Section 379 (theft) of the Indian Penal Code. Few months later, the police lodged a final report stating that the vehicle was untraceable.

First Published Date: 30 Sep 2021, 19:34 PM IST
Recommended For You
View All
NEXT ARTICLE BEGINS

Please provide your details to get Personalized Offers on

Choose city
+91 | Choose city
Choose city
Choose city
By clicking VIEW OFFERS you Agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy

Dear Name

Please verify your mobile number.

+91 | Choose city