Uber, Lyft must convert drivers into employees, California judge rules
Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. were ordered to convert their California drivers from independent contractors to employees with benefits, an early loss in a court battle the gig economy can’t afford to lose.
The judge’s ruling Monday won’t be the last word, as the ride-hailing companies are expected to appeal the far-reaching preliminary injunction that could make them halt their services as they figure out how to adjust their business model to comply with it.
Trending Cars
Find More Cars
 (1).jpg "Kia Sonet (HT Auto photo)")
The case brought by California officials to enforce a state labor law that took effect this year is the most serious legal threat yet to the gig economy -- and comes at a particularly difficult time for the ridesharing industry. Decimated by travel restrictions related to the coronavirus, Uber widened its losses and reported a 67% decline in ride revenue during the June quarter.
(Also read: Are Uber drivers self employed? Battle for rights at workplace reaches UK SC)
The news erased some of Lyft’s stock gains Monday, and Uber shares ended the day almost 2% down. Lyft will report its results Wednesday.
San Francisco Superior Court Judge Ethan Schulman paused the injunction for 10 days so the companies can appeal his decision.
Uber and Lyft didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
If Uber reclassifies its drivers as employees, ride prices would increase as much as 30% in San Francisco and as much as 120% in the less populated Inland Empire where demand is sparse, according to an analysis by Uber.
(Also read: Uber, Lyft drivers to be trained for Covid-19 safety by New York University)
Schulman agreed with California Attorney General Xavier Becerra that Uber and Lyft are violating Assembly Bill 5, which says workers can generally only be considered contractors if they perform duties outside the usual course of a company’s business. If the companies are forced to reclassify their California drivers as employees, they would be on the hook for overtime, health care and other costly benefits.
Lyft’s lawyer argued at an Aug. 6 hearing that the injunction sought by Becerra would wreak havoc on the companies’ services and cause “massive harm" to drivers and riders.The city of San Francisco, where both ride-hailing companies are based, joined Becerra’s suit and argued drivers have suffered for years as Uber and Lyft had have grown into giants by violating state labor law.
The case is California v. Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc., CGC-20-584402, California Superior Court (San Francisco).
