Main Renault unions reject cost-cutting plans: Sources
- Renault has outlined 2 billion euros ($2.3 billion) in savings, including via job cuts and reorganising its factories, to restore profitability.
The four main unions representing employees at Renault oppose its cost-cutting plans, union sources said, adding to the French carmaker's restructuring headaches.
Loss-making Renault, which is 15% owned by the French government, has outlined 2 billion euros ($2.3 billion) in savings, including via job cuts and reorganising its factories, to restore profitability.
Also check these Vehicles
1499 cc
Petrol
26.8kWh
271 KmEmployee representatives only have a consultative role in the plans, but rejecting them would complicate the task for new Chief Executive Luca de Meo.
De Meo, who arrived in July, had called on staff to back him in a recent internal memo seen by Reuters, saying: "I need you to carry out this turnaround."
The CFE-CGC, CFDT, CGT and Force Ouvriere unions rejected Renault's plans at a meeting with representatives of the firm on Tuesday, four union sources said.
Also Read : Renault unveils brand-focused revamp to help spur turnaround
The CFE-CGC union confirmed its opposition to the cuts in a statement, saying it was not convinced by the way Renault planned to go about its plans even if it understood the economic imperatives.
Renault declined to comment.
The company has like peers been hit hard by the coronavirus crisis, which forced it to halt production earlier this year while dealerships also closed temporarily.
This exacerbated existing problems with profitability, and De Meo wants Renault to produce fewer cars while improving margins. The firm plans to cut 15,000 jobs worldwide in the next three years, including 4,600 in France.
Unions have rejected wide-ranging layoff plans by other carmakers in France before, including at Peugeot-maker PSA in 2012. This has not stopped them from going ahead.
But PSA managed to get unions on board for subsequent competitiveness agreements, which included wage freezes.
