ARAI, ICAT officials under scanner for awarding FAME II incentives to EV makers

The Centre has sought ₹469 crore from seven electric two-wheeler makers for claiming incentives while not complying with the FAME II scheme norms. On
...
Hero Electric
Hero Electric is among seven electric two-wheeler manufacturers who are facing legal action over unpaid dues of FAME II incentives offered by the Centre.
Hero Electric
Hero Electric is among seven electric two-wheeler manufacturers who are facing legal action over unpaid dues of FAME II incentives offered by the Centre.

The Centre has launched an inquiry against officials for allegedly handing EV subsidies to manufacturers who had not met Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Electric Vehicles norms. The officials, who are part of agencies like Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI) and International Centre for Automotive Technology (ICAT), have been alleged of offering FAME II subsidies to seven EV makers. These EV makers include the likes of Hero Electric and Okinawa Autotech among others. A probe conducted earlier had revealed these companies received fiscal incentives under the FAME II scheme by violating the norms.

According to the Heavy Industries Ministry, the ARAI and ICAT officials had shown lapses while offering FAME II subsidies to the seven EV manufacturers. As many as 13 EV makers, including Ola Electric, were named among possible defaulters in the case. The Centre had asked ARAI and ICAT to to investigate whether the manufacturers had followed localisation guidelines mentioned in the FAME II scheme. At the end of the investigation, seven EV makers were found to have violated the norms. "We are enquiring into the lapses, if any, by all officials involved in the process," said Union Heavy Industries Minister Mahendra Nath Pandey.

Also check these Bikes

Find more Bikes
Hero Electric Photon (HT Auto photo)
1.872 kWh 45 Kmph 60 Km
₹72,990
Compare
Okinawa Praisepro (HT Auto photo)
2.0 kWh 58 kmph 88 km/charge
₹76,848
Compare
Hero Electric Nyx (HT Auto photo)
1.536 kWh 42 kmph 130 km
₹ 0.62 - 0.83 Lakhs
Compare
View Offers
Hero Electric Ae-8 (HT Auto photo)
UPCOMING
3 kWh 45 kmph 80 km
₹70,000
View Details
Okinawa R30 (HT Auto photo)
1.25 KWH 25 kmph 60 km/charge
₹58,992
Compare
Amo Mobility Jaunty-3w (HT Auto photo)
26 Ah 25 kmph 75 km
₹75,499
Compare

Earlier this year, the government issued notice to EV makers for violating localisation norms, a key requisite to avail benefits under the 10,000-crore scheme. The scheme clearly outlines that companies who can claim incentives under the scheme must produce electric vehicles by using made-in-India components. The Phased Manufacturing Plan (PMP) rules under the scheme was finalised to boost domestic manufacturing of electric vehicles.

The Centre had sought 469 crore from seven electric two-wheeler makers for claiming incentives while not complying with the FAME II scheme norms. Only Revolt Motors out of these seven EV makers has offered to refund the amount so far. Besides Hero Electric, Okinawa Autotech and Revolt Motors, the four other manufacturers named as defaulters are Ampere EV, Benling India, Amo Mobility and Lohia Auto.

The first of the FAME schemes was launched on April 1, 2015, with a total outlay of 895 crore in an effort to promote electric and hybrid vehicles faster. The FAME-II scheme was announced in 2019 with an outlay of 10,000 crore. According to the Society of Manufacturers of Electric Vehicles (SMEV), EV makers in India have suffered a loss of more than 9,000 crore on account of unpaid dues and loss of market after their subsidies were stopped last year.

First Published Date: 23 Nov 2023, 09:25 AM IST
NEXT ARTICLE BEGINS

Please provide your details to get Personalized Offers on

Choose city
+91 | Choose city
Choose city
Choose city

Want to get the best price for your existing car?

Powered by: Spinny Logo
By clicking "View Offers" you Agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy

Dear Name

Please verify your mobile number.

+91 | Choose city
Couldn't verify the OTP.
It's either expired or it's incorrect.